The Effect of Intelligence Numeric, Learning Discipline and Learning Motivation on Formative Test Results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61193/jidr.v1i1.2Abstrak
The purpose of this study was to determine the direct effect and indirect influence of a variable. The research data was processed and analyzed using path analysis method. Conclusions are obtained (1) There is a significant direct effect of intelligence numeric on the results of formative tests; (2) There is a significant direct effect of learning discipline on the results of formative tests; (3) There is a significant direct effect of learning motivation on the results of formative tests; (4) There is a significant direct effect of intelligence numeric on learning motivation; (5) There is a significant direct influence of intelligence numericalon learning discipline; (6) There is a significant direct effect of learning discipline on learning motivation; (7) There is no significant indirect effect of intelligence numericon motivation to learn through learning discipline; (8) There is no significant indirect effect of intelligence numeric on the results of formative tests through learning discipline; (9) There is no significant indirect effect of intelligence numeric on the results of formative tests through learning motivation; and (10) There is no significant indirect effect of intelligence numeric on the results of formative tests through learning discipline and learning motivation.
Referensi
Abdullah, S.I. (2015). Kompilasi Definisi dan Referensi Variabel Kependidikan. Jakarta: Lembaga Responsible Development International Indonesia (Lembaga RDII).
Armstrong, Thomas. (2002). Seven Kinds of Smart. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hamalik, O. (2009). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Indrawati, F. (2013). Pengaruh kemampuan numerik dan cara belajar terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3 (3), 215-223 http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i3.126
Irawan, A. (2014). Pengaruh kecerdasan numerik dan pengusaan konsep matematika terhadap kamampuan berpikir kritik matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 4 (1): 46-55 http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v4i1.138
Makmun, A.S. (2009). Psikologi Kependidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurmantoro, M.A. (2017). Pengaruh kemampuan awal, kecerdasan emosi dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan "Menjadi Guru Pembelajar", 1-11. Jakarta: Keluarga Alumni Universitas Indraprasta PGRI. https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/repository/article/viewFile/1659/1281
Purwanto, M.N. (2000). Psikologi Pendidikan Cetakan Keenam Belas. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sajiman, S.U. (2011). Intensitas penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran kalkulus dengan mengendalikan kemampuan awal mahasiswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 1 (1): 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v1i1.63
Sajiman, S.U. (2013). Hasil belajar matematika siswa ditinjau dari interaksi tes formatif uraian dan kecerdasan emosional. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA 3 (2),78-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i2.115
Sajiman, S.U. (2014). Peran kedisiplinan belajar dan kecerdasan matematis logis dalam pembelajaran matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 4 (2): 80-88.http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v4i2.142
Seruni (2013). Pengaruh penguasaan konsep matematika dan kreativitas belajar terhadap perilaku disiplin. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 3 (3): 250-259 http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i3.130
Syah, M. (2002). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tu’u,T. (2004). Peran Disiplin Pada Perilaku dan Prestasi Siswa. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2021 Journal of Instructional Development Research
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
